13924 stories
·
4 followers

Peter Mandelson, the Russian superyacht and the scandal we completely misread

2 Shares

The recent release of the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice has so far led to little accountability in the US for the many sordid crimes revealed there, but it has caused the swift and decisive downfall of Peter Mandelson. On Monday he was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, having been under investigation due to allegations he shared market-sensitive government information with Epstein when he was a minister in Gordon Brown’s government (it’s been reported he does not think he’s committed an offence). A scion of New Labour who rode to power with the Blair government, he famously declared in 1998 that he was “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich as long as they pay their taxes”. True to his word, he frequently relaxed in the company of billionaires. In 2008, this led to the affair known as “Yachtgate”, which seemed shocking at the time, but in the light of the revelations in the Epstein files looks like a pretty quaint idea of a scandal.

Yachtgate was about political figures rubbing shoulders with shady Russian oligarchs. It hinted at possible financial improprieties. The superyacht, moored off the coast of Corfu, belonged to Oleg Deripaska, a Russian aluminium magnate who had his US visa revoked in 2006 because of suspected ties to organised crime. In Europe, Deripaska was benefiting from the lifting of EU tariffs on aluminium in 2007, so when Mandelson, Britain’s EU commissioner in charge of trade, showed up on his boat, questions were raised about a possible conflict of interest. 

Other guests at the party included Mandelson’s good friend Nathaniel (Nat) Rothschild, a financier and heir to the Rothschild fortune (Mandelson often stayed at his villa in Corfu), and Rothschild’s old schoolmate, the then shadow chancellor George Osborne. Rothschild was so livid that gossip about the party had made the papers that he wrote a letter to the Times, insisting that the only impropriety to have taken place was Osborne trying to solicit from Deripaska, a foreign national, a donation to the Tory party. The editor of the Times, Rothschild’s friend James Harding, published it and soon the waters around Yachtgate were muddied. People lost track and lost interest. 

Perhaps we should have suspected that this particular constellation of people sharing cocktails on the Ionian Sea wasn’t just happenstance. Deripaska was a businessman with a sketchy past (Roman Abramovich once said of the 1990s “aluminium wars” in Russia that “every three days someone was being murdered”; Deripaska came out the winner). But he was also a close associate of Vladimir Putin and had swept into London in the early 2000s, forging relationships with Britain’s political and monied elites that could be strategically useful for Russia. None of the relationships between these men, as we see in the Epstein files, were straightforward friendships.

Mandelson had done favours for Deripaska and would go on to trade access to him in exchange for favours from others. We now know that, contrary to the story he told in 2008 about when he first met Deripaska, Mandelson had arrived at an EU-Russia summit in The Hague on Deripaska’s Gulfstream IV jet in 2004. We also know that Mandelson and Rothschild flew to Siberia with Deripaska in 2005, where the three visited a sauna together and were thrashed with birch leaves. And now, thanks to the Epstein files, we know that, in 2010, Mandelson asked Deripaska to help a friend of his, convicted sex trafficker and questionable financier Jeffrey Epstein, get a Russian visa. 

Rothschild apparently nixed Epstein’s introduction to Deripaska in 2011. He had an interest in keeping Deripaska to himself. In 2009, he had signed up to buy a large stake in Deripaska’s aluminium company Rusal when it launched on the Hong Kong stock exchange in 2010 (this was probably the reason he was so sensitive about being in the press during Yachtgate – he didn’t want to jeopardise that relationship). He made a $40m investment in the commodities and mining company Glencore in the same year, a company which had complex and somewhat opaque relations with Rusal, including holding a stake in Rusal’s parent company, Deripaska’s EN+ Group.  But Mandelson evidently persisted. Soon he, Rothschild, Deripaska and Epstein would be part of a world that had little regard for laws or loyalties, but was held together by different types of indebtedness and varying degrees of kompromat

For a long time the public assumed that the secrets of these elites involved “white collar” crimes, like tax evasion or financial fraud. Glencore has been an object of unrelenting suspicion since the 1980s when its founders, Marc Rich and Pincus Green, were indicted for tax evasion, wire fraud and racketeering (Bill Clinton would later, in one of the greatest scandals of his presidency, pardon Rich). In the early 2000s, the CIA suspected Glencore of paying illegal kickbacks to evade UN sanctions on buying oil from Iraq. Similar charges have dogged the company to the present day. In 2022 they were ordered to pay a $1.5bn fine for corrupt activities in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria and Venezuela. Related prosecutions are ongoing. But it’s not just “white collar crime” – the wealth of men like Marc Rich and Deripaska is reputed to have originated in mob ties, which would implicate them in much worse things. And we now know from the Epstein files and related sources that this code of secrecy, binding together people who can be trusted only because they are all compromised, has covered up horrors.

In 2008, as Mandelson partied on yachts, his good friend Epstein was fighting federal child trafficking charges. In the end he pleaded guilty to much lesser state charges, including soliciting prostitution from a minor. He served just 13 months in exceptionally comfortable circumstances and when he emerged, now a registered sex offender, many of his powerful friends stood by him. The reality that they were apparently able to overlook, in spite of scarcely hidden and even flaunted evidence, was that girls as young as 14 were being raped and trafficked. 

None of the headline-making stories about the varying degrees of complicity of Epstein's famous friends can prepare you for the grim reality of child rape revealed in the files that have been released and in the horrifying accounts of survivors. It makes very uncomfortable viewing and reading, but you have to understand how viscerally disgusting it all was to appreciate how deeply the perpetrators were compromised. And any friends who had an inkling of what was going on were compromised too, because their silence was a form of complicity. Many of those who didn’t directly participate in the abuse of the girls (like Mandelson, who is gay), must have seen the constant retinue of teenagers, often half-naked (though, as Virginia Giuffre tells us in her memoir, on his island Epstein insisted they hang around fully naked). They must have heard crude boasts of the kind we can now read in the messages. These people traded favours with Epstein and his friends anyway. 

What Mandelson wanted out of it seems to have been fairly simple: money. Tony Blair had been making a fortune exploiting his political connections since founding Tony Blair Associates in 2008. He continued making valuable connections out of office in his position as Middle East envoy representing the “Quartet” of Russia, the US, the EU and the UN. So in September 2012, when Glencore ran into trouble over a deal Rothschild supported (a merger with mining group Xstrata), Blair could use his connections to Qatar’s royal family to help broker the deal at the last moment. Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, QIA, held a stake in Xstrata and had been opposing the merger before Blair’s intervention. This favour apparently earned him around £250,000. It was lucrative to be part of this money-go-round. 

But Mandelson didn’t have quite the same cachet. The new files show that in 2011 he had sought a role at Glencore himself, with Rothschild advising him to talk to its billionaire CEO, Ivan Glasenberg. Epstein schemed with Mandelson about how to make this happen. It didn’t work out. But what Mandelson could do was trade on his access to business partners in Russia. In 2010, Mandelson founded a consultancy business, Global Counsel, with a former Blair adviser, Benjamin Wegg-Prosser. They had a natural base in Moscow because Wegg-Prosser had worked since 2007 for a big Moscow online media company, SUP, and he and his Russian wife, Yulia, continued dividing time between Russia and the UK. And the Epstein files show that Global Counsel immediately began soliciting business in Russia, primarily with a large nanotechnology group called Rusnano Group. That was the same year that Mandelson tried to use his connection with Deripaska to wrangle a last-minute Russian visa for Epstein. 

Other emails show that in 2011 Mandelson was consulting Epstein about some potential business with Yuri Milner, a Russian oligarch who had been making large investments in Facebook. Epstein said: “You must be careful if you want this and will visit lebedev [sic]” – presumably referring to London-based oligarch and former KGB officer Alexander Lebedev, who had been investing heavily in British media (he acquired the Evening Standard in 2009, and the Independent in 2010). Interestingly, the following year Epstein cautioned another friend to take care with Milner, saying “yuri money is russian gangster money, usmanov…[sic]”. In 2017 it was revealed that the Kremlin had been behind many of Milner’s strategic investments in Silicon Valley, with the money being funnelled through the Russian mining oligarch and former Arsenal shareholder Alisher Usmanov. 

If Epstein, Mandelson and others knew this, Britain’s intelligence services and political classes should have too. But in yet another sign of the entanglement of British politics with Russian money, Liberal Democrat peer Lord Owen has served as a representative for Usmanov, and the late Lord Myners, a former Labour treasury minister, was on the board of Usmanov’s telecoms group, MegaFon, until 2018. Meanwhile, Mandelson took a directorship of Sistema in 2013, a Russian conglomerate with shareholdings in defence companies, and refused to resign when Putin invaded Crimea the following year. But sometimes it’s convenient to ignore what everyone knows, and a silent bond is forged between those ignoring it. 

None of the men in these circles were naive about Russian money. Epstein least of all. He set out to become an adviser to the Kremlin at just the time Putin was silencing all dissent domestically, had intensified his hybrid warfare on liberal democracy, and made clear his expansionist ambitions. Between 2013 and 2018, Epstein sent many messages to people who could act as intermediaries between Putin and himself. He used three friends in particular for this purpose: former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, former Norwegian prime minister and  secretary-general of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland, and Emirati billionaire Sultan bin Sulayem, all of whom were holding private meetings with Putin. Epstein didn’t just want money, he wanted influence – he was always very close to power. It made sense in this amoral world for Mandelson to maintain a friendship with him for nearly two decades in spite of what he knew and pretended not to know.

The full story hasn’t yet been told. We probably only have a fraction of the materials the FBI and DoJ obtained. The files that are public are still redacted. But we can already see a dark realm, set apart from laws, morality and the most basic humane impulses. It’s inhabited by some of the world’s most powerful men: Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Bill Gates and many others. And now that we’ve seen just a glimpse of this world into which Yachtgate was potentially a window, we have to wonder why no one took a better look 18 years ago. 

Tamsin Shaw is Associate Professor of European and Mediterranean Studies and Philosophy, New York University

The Nerve is a fearless, independent media title launched by five former Guardian / Observer journalists: investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr, editors Sarah Donaldson, Jane Ferguson and Imogen Carter and creative director Lynsey Irvine. We cover culture, politics and tech, brought to you in twice-weekly newsletters on Tuesdays and Fridays (sign up here). We rely on funding from our community, so please also consider joining us as a paying member. You can read more about our mission here.
Read the whole story
JimB
1 day ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

How mercury from coal plants can cost lives

1 Share
Coal-fired power plants are a major source of mercury contamination for people and the environment. Here's what you need to know.
Read the whole story
JimB
5 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

KFC, Nando's, and others ditch chicken welfare pledge

1 Share
Wingstop, Burger King, and others have walked away from an industry commitment to avoid using fast-growing chickens
Read the whole story
JimB
5 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Did Alberto Santos-Dumont Really Invent the Airplane?

1 Share

If you were to ask the average American “who invented the aeroplane?” the answer you would most likely get is the Wright Brothers. Indeed, the two bicycle mechanics from Dayton, Ohio, are generally acknowledged to have carried out the first controlled, powered, heavier-than-air flight in history, piloting their aircraft the Flyer a distance of 36.5 metres at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina on December 17, 1903. But if you were to ask the same question in Brazil, you would likely get a very different answer. To many Brazilians the true father of the aeroplane is neither Orville nor Wilbur Wright but rather a fellow countryman named Alberto Santos-Dumont. Though largely forgotten today, in his day Santos-Dumont was one of the most famous men in the world and a leading figure in the field of aviation, pioneering key innovations in airship design and making the first powered heavier-than-air flight in Europe. He was also a legendarily colourful character, whose eccentric, high-flying antics perfectly capturing the optimistic, free-wheeling spirit of the Gilded Age.

Alberto Santos-Dumont was born on July 20, 1873 in Palmira, Brazil, to Henrique Dumont and Francisca de Paula Santos, the wealthy owners of a coffee plantation. Free of the responsibilities of work, young Santos-Dumont enjoyed a charmed, free-range childhood on the family plantation, where he quickly developed a fascination for all things mechanical:

“I lived a free life there, which was indispensable to form my temperament and taste for adventure. Since childhood I had a great love for mechanical things, and like all those who have or think they have a vocation, I cultivated mine with care and passion. I always played at imagining and building little mechanical devices, which entertained me and earned me high regard in the family. My greatest joy was taking care of my father’s mechanical installations. That was my department, which made me very proud.”

These mechanical diversions included improving his father’s coffee bean-sorting machines and driving narrow-gauge steam locomotives at high speed across the plantation. But in 1888 Santos-Dumont discovered the passion which was to consume him for the rest of his life. Upon witnessing an aeronaut make a balloon ascent over São Paulo, the then 15-year-old Santos-Dumont – an avid daydreamer and reader of French science fiction author Jules Verne – became singularly obsessed with the conquest of flight, later writing:

“In the long, sun-bathed Brazilian afternoons, I would lie in the shade of the veranda and gaze into the fair sky of Brazil, where you have only to raise your eyes to fall in love with space and freedom. So, musing on the exploration of the aerial ocean, I too devised airships and flying machines in my imagination.”

Santos-Dumont’s obsession only intensified when he accompanied his father on a seven-month visit to Paris in 1891. At the time, France was the global centre for aeronautics research. The country had a long aeronautical tradition stretching back to 1783, when the Montgolfier Brothers made the first manned hot air balloon ascents, while in 1890 inventor Clément Ader’s [“Klem-ahn Ah-day”] steam-powered Éole [“Eh-all”] aircraft made a short but promising hop into the air. If any nation was to conquer the skies first, it was believed, it would be France. Parisians were also far more accepting of the eccentricities which made Santos-Dumont stand out in his native Brazil. Standing barely five feet tall and weighing 110 pounds, the diminutive Brazilian wore high collars, thick-soled American shoes, and a trademark floppy Panama hat to make himself look taller, and introduced himself with the words:

“I’m Santos, I weigh 41 kilos without my shoes but with my gloves.”

Later, Santos-Dumont’s fame as an aviator would turn him into a fashion icon, helping, among other things, to make high starched collars fashionable in France.

In 1892, Santos-Dumont’s father, his health failing, gifted his son a sizeable share in the family coffee company. Seizing the opportunity, Santos-Dumont moved to Paris and threw himself single-mindedly into his quest of conquering the skies. He lived simply in a modest apartment on Rue Washington, eschewing the city’s rich social life as he pursued an intense private education in science, mathematics, engineering, and all the other subjects he would need to accomplish his goal. At the same time he pursued his passion for tinkering, inventing one of the first wristwatches and building a three-wheeled motorcycle on which he tore down the streets of Paris at the then-bracing speed 32 kilometres per hour. In 1897 Santos-Dumont made his first ascent in a hired balloon, an experience which only confirmed his life’s calling:

“I observed the pilot at his work, and comprehended perfectly all he did. It seemed to me that I had been born for aeronautics.”

By the end of the year Santos-Dumont had built his own balloon and become an experienced aeronaut with 25 ascents under his belt. But mere passive ballooning was not enough; if he was truly to conquer the skies, he would have to crack the secret of building a powered, dirigible airship. Many had tried before, including Frenchman Henri Giffard [“Ghee-far”], who in 1852 made the first powered airship flight. However, like all his contemporaries, Giffard was stymied by the propulsion technology of his time. The steam engine which powered his dirigible was not only dangerous – its open-flame boiler threatening at all times to ignite the hydrogen in the balloon – but also heavy and underpowered, making it impossible for the craft to fly against the wind. The first dirigible to complete a full circuit against the wind was La France in 1884, which was powered not by steam but electricity. However, the batteries needed to accomplish this feat were crude and heavy, making this a less than optimal solution. Practical dirigible flight thus had to await the development of a compact internal combustion engine with a high enough power-to-weight ratio. Santos-Dumont had used just such an engine in one of his early motor tricycles. Weighing only 40 kilos and putting out 3.5 horsepower, it was quickly pressed into service to power Santos-Dumont’s first prototype airship.

Imaginatively named “Airship No.1,” the cigar-shaped craft measured 25 metres long and held 186 cubic metres of Hydrogen. It had a triangular rudder at the front for steering, a sliding-weight system for pitch control, and a basket slung beneath the envelope holding both pilot and the engine driving a paddle-shaped propeller. Santos-Dumont attempted his first test flight on September 18, 1898, launching near the Zoological Gardens in Paris’s Bois de Boulogne [“Bwah deh Boo-lung”] Park. While Santos-Dumont had originally planned to take off into the wind, his aeronaut colleagues advised him instead to take off downwind as with a balloon. Unfortunately, a gust of wind drove Airship No.1 into the trees before it could gain sufficient altitude, lightly damaging the craft and convincing Santos-Dumont of the wisdom of his original plan. He quickly repaired the damage and two days later made another attempt, this time succeeding in making a short controlled circuit. Santos-Dumont would later describe the experience in his signature breathless style:

“My first impression was surprise to feel the airship going straight ahead. It was astonishing to feel the wind in my face…I cannot describe the delight, the wonder and intoxication of this free diagonal movement onward and upward, or onward and downward, combined with brusque changes of direction horizontally when the airship answers to a touch of the rudder.”

Unfortunately, the flight was cut short when lifting gas began leaking from the envelope, causing Airship No.1 to rapidly lose altitude. Santos-Dumont called out to a group of boys flying kites in the park below, who grabbed the trailing mooring lines and brought the airship down to a rough but safe crash-landing. Though the craft was damaged beyond repair, Santos-Dumont was undeterred; he had tasted the thrill of controlled, powered flight and was hungry for more. Over the next six years he would construct a series of increasingly-sophisticated airships, breaking records by staying aloft for up to 23 hours at a time. His later dirigibles were so maneuverable and reliable that Santos-Dumont took to using them as his personal runabouts, leading to some truly outlandish escapades. In 1903 a correspondent for the Paris weekly L’Illustration described one such incident:

“I had just sat down at the terrace of a café on the Avenue fu Bois de Boulogne and was enjoying an iced orangeade. All of a sudden I was shaken with surprise on seeing an airship come right down in front of me. The guide rope coiled around the legs of my chair. The airship was just above my knees, and Monsieur Santos-Dumont got out. Whole crowds of people rushed forward and wildly acclaimed the great Brazilian aviator. He asked me to excuse him for having startled me. He then called for an apéritif, drank it down, got on board his airship again and went gliding off into space.”

On another occasion the eccentric aviator swooped down onto a birthday party in the park, snatched up a 7-year-old boy, and took the ecstatic child for a joyride over Paris. And on Bastille Day, he celebrated his adopted country’s national holiday by flying down the Champs d’Elysees and saluting the French President with 21 shots from his revolver – like an absolute legend. These antics endeared Santos-Dumont to the French people, who closely followed his exploits and affectionately dubbed him “the little Santos.” But Santos-Dumont’s greatest aerial triumphs were yet to come.

On March 24, 1900, oil magnate Henri Deutsch de la Meurthe announced a 100,000 Franc prize for the first aviator to fly from the Aero Club headquarters at Saint Cloud [“Klood”] to the Eiffel Tower and back – a total distance of 10 kilometres – in less than half an hour. Santos-Dumont eagerly accepted the challenge, but quickly realized that none of his existing airships were up to the task. To cover the distance in under a half an hour would require a top speed of at least 9 kilometres an hour, while his fastest craft, Airship No.4, topped out at only 7.5. So Santos-Dumont enlarged the envelope and added a rigid keel and a new 15-horsepower engine to create a new, faster vehicle, named – of course – Airship No.5.

Santos-Dumont his first attempt at the Deutsche de la Meurthe Prize on July 13, 1901. The flight went well at first, with Airship No.5 reaching and circling the Eiffel Tower with ease. But on the return leg, the airship stalled and crashed into a chestnut tree on the estate of the wealthy Rothschild family. Though his pride may have been wounded, Santos-Dumont was at least able to find solace in the estate footman who climbed the tree to deliver him a conciliatory picnic basket. Undeterred, Santos-Dumont repaired Airship No.5 and made his second attempt on August 8. Once again he successfully reached and rounded the Eiffel Tower, but on his return a faulty valve caused the envelope to rapidly lose gas. Santos-Dumont attempted to guide the sinking craft to a crash landing in the Seine river, but at the last moment the envelope snagged on a chimney pot atop the Trocadero Hotel and burst. The whole airship collapsed in a heap of wreckage down the side of the hotel, with Santos-Dumont barely escaping death by leaping onto a window ledge. There he remained stranded for several hours before being rescued by the Paris fire brigade. But though the flight had ended in complete failure, “Little Santos” continued to be hailed as a hero by the people of France.

With Airship No.5 a complete loss, Santos-Dumont and his workmen designed and built a new, more powerful airship in only 22 days. Meanwhile, however, the Aero Club had changed the rules of the Prize, dictating that the 30 minute time limit now be measured from takeoff to landing rather than a flying start and finish. This change was introduced by patriotic club members in an attempt to hold off Santos-Dumont until a fellow Frenchman could claim the prize. Yet despite this handicap, Santos-Dumont was confident he could still meet the challenge, and at 2:45 PM on October 19, 1901, he lifted off from St. Cloud for his third attempt at the Prize. As before the outbound leg went perfectly, with Airship No.6 covering the distance in only 9 minutes. And while Santos-Dumont faced a 7 km/hr headwind on the return leg, with 21 minutes to cover the distance he seemed assured of clinching the Prize. But soon after rounding the Eiffel Tower his engine began to sputter and stall, slowing his progress to a crawl. As a stunned Paris came to a standstill and turned its gaze to the tiny airship floating 300 metres overhead, Santos-Dumont, with no safety harness, climbed out of the basket and up to the keel to fix the stubborn machine. After a few tense minutes the engine resumed its steady chug, and Santos-Dumont drove the airship at full speed towards St. Cloud, crossing the finish line 29 minutes and 30 seconds after takeoff. Unfortunately, it took around a minute for him to actually land the airship, and when the waiting Aero Club delegates finally approached him he was sadly informed that he had missed the prize by 40 seconds. A devastated Santos-Dumont returned to his apartment empty-handed while throngs of his supporters shouted at the delegation to award him the prize. In the end, the Aero Club bowed to public pressure and declared Santos-Dumont the winner of the Deutsch de la Meurthe Prize. In an act of extreme generosity, Santos-Dumont donated 75,000 Francs to the poor of Paris and divided the rest among his own workmen. He did, however, keep an additional 125,000 Franc prize awarded to him by his native Brazil. But his true pride lay not in the monetary awards but in having successfully demonstrated the practicality of powered, dirigible flights.

Though Santos-Dumont would go on to build three more airships, by 1903 he had become disillusioned with the technology. The vagaries of wind and weather made flying an airship, in his words, like “pushing a candle through a brick wall.” Convinced he had pushed airship technology as far as it would go, Santos-Dumont instead turned his energies to the next great challenge: heavier-than-air flight. By this time the Wright Brothers had completed a highly-successful series of gliding experiments and were preparing to test their first powered aircraft at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. News of the Wrights’ achievements sent the French aviation community into a panic, with French aviation pioneer Ferdinand Ferber writing Aero Club President Ernest Archdeacon in April 1903:

“The airplane must not be allowed to reach successful development in America!”

A tireless promoter of aviation in France and around the world, Ferber was considered one of the frontrunners in the race for heavier-than-air flight. In 1902 he constructed an aircraft based on vague descriptions of the Wright Brothers’ designs, which he tested by suspending it beneath a giant spinning crane-like contraption outside the city of Nice. But Ferber had fundamentally misunderstood the Wrights’ key innovation of wing warping for roll control, and his copycat aircraft proved all but uncontrollable. Ferber’s failure was typical of a general flaw shared by French aeronautics pioneers compared to their American counterparts. Whereas the Wrights took a methodical, scientific approach, basing their designs on glider flights and wind tunnel tests, the French, in their haste to get into the air, rushed forward with all manner of hastily-conceived and impractical flying machines. Thus it was all but inevitable that on December 17, 1903, the Wright Brothers beat the French – and the rest of the world – into the air. But the French were not so easily defeated, and to spur the development of heavier-than-air flight in France, in 1905 Aero Club President Ernest Archdeacon announced a 1500 Franc prize for the first pilot to fly an aeroplane over 100 metres. And among the pioneering aviators who took up the challenge was Alberto Santos-Dumont.

In 1906, Santos-Dumont built an aircraft nearly as eccentric as its designer. Dubbed the Quatorze Bis [“Cat-oars Biss”] or “Fourteen B”, the craft appeared to have been built backwards, with the wings, engine, and propellor in the back and the horizontal stabilizer in the front – a design known today as a canard configuration due to its resemblance to a flying duck. Adding to its awkward appearance, it featured boxy, kite-like wings and stabilizers canted upwards at steep angle, while the pilot flew the aircraft while standing up. Stranger still, the aircraft was designed to be test-flown while suspended beneath Santos-Dumont’s Airship No.14 – hence the name.

On July 23, 1926, a crowd gathered outside the Bois de Boulogne park to witness Santos-Dumont’s first flight tests. In true flamboyant style, Santos Dumont in his Mercedes car led a bizarre procession consisting of the 14 Bis aircraft and No.14 airship towed by a donkey, followed by a handcart loaded with 10 cans of gasoline. However, a guard at the park gate refused to let the gasoline through, and threatened to poke holes in the airship if anyone challenged him. Thankfully, Ernest Archdeacon was on hand and siphoned gas from his own car to fuel up both airship and aeroplane. But it was all for naught, for Santos-Dumont discovered the 14 Bis had been damaged in transit and announced to a disappointed crowd that he would not be flying that day.

Over the next month Santos-Dumont and his team conducted a number of pre-flight tests with the 14 Bis suspended beneath the No.14 airship and a zipline-like device, making a number of adjustments until they were at last ready to make a free flight attempt. On September 13, the 14 Bis made a short 13-metre hop before crash-landing on its tail, while on October 23 it flew a more respectable 60 metres, making Santos-Dumont the first person to make a controlled, powered, heavier-than-air flight in Europe. Finally, on November 12, Santos-Dumont remained airborne for 21 seconds, covering a distance of 220 metres and clinching the Archdeacon Prize. The nation erupted in celebration, with Ferdinand Ferber exclaiming:

“Santos is the conquering hero…a new world [is] opening before man.”

Even the British joined in the adulation, though some struck a more alarmist tone. Among these was publishing magnate Lord Northcliffe, who prophetically wrote:

“Santos-Dumont flies 722 feet! Let me tell you, there will be no more sleeping safely behind the wooden walls of old England with the Channel as our safety moat. If war comes, the aerial chariots of the enemy will descend on British soil.”

Yet despite the excitement on both sides of the Channel in reality, Santos-Dumont’s achievement was a case of too little, too late. Like most early French aircraft, the 14 Bis lacked adequate roll control, barely qualifying as a controllable aircraft. Furthermore, a full year before in late 1905 the Wrights had made history by flying their aircraft an astonishing 39 kilometres over Huffman Prairie in Ohio, utterly dwarfing Santos-Dumont’s 220-metre hop. In August 1908 Wilbur Wright would demonstrate the superior agility of the brothers’ Model A Flyer over Le Mans racetrack outside Paris, prompting French aviation pioneer Leon Delagrange [“Lay-ohn Duh-lah-grahnje”] to exclaim “we are beaten!” Yet some, especially in Brazil, continue to maintain that it was Santos-Dumont, not the Wright Brothers, who was first into the air. This assertion is based on the fact that the 14 Bis had wheels while the early Wright aircraft had skids and were launched from a track using a falling-wight catapult device. Later rules set out by the Federation Aeronautique Internationale or FAI dictate that to qualify for a flight record an aircraft must take off and land entirely under its own power, meaning, according to Wright Brothers detractors, that only Santos-Dumont’s attempts technically count as actual flights. However, this argument ignores that on the Wrights’ historic 1903 flight, the Flyer did indeed take off under its own power. Furthermore, as with the argument that cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin was not the first into space in 1961 because he ejected and did not land with his spacecraft, the FAI has proven itself willing to ignore minor technicalities if the case for a record is obvious enough.

Santos-Dumont performed several more short flights in the 14 Bis before moving on to a more sophisticated design he dubbed the Demoiselle or “damselfly”. Built of lightweight bamboo struts with the pilot seated in a frame suspended directly beneath the wing, the Demoiselle is considered by many historians to be the very first ultralight aircraft. Santos-Dumont piloted the fast and agile Demoiselle on numerous record-breaking flights, including a 200 kilometre cross-country trip between St. Cyr [“Saint Seer”] and Buc [“Book”] in September 1909. With his typical generosity and enthusiasm for aviation, Santos-Dumont released the plans for the aircraft for free, and over 300 copies were built in Europe and the United States. But the Demoiselle was to be Santos-Dumont’s last aerial achievement. In 1909 he began suffering the symptoms of multiple sclerosis and, after making his last flights at the first great Air Show at Riems, closed up his shop, disbanded his workmen, and withdrew into depression and exile. Over the next 20 years he drifted between Europe and his native Brazil, dabbling in astronomy, tinkering with various inventions, and making impassioned pleas against the use of aircraft in warfare. All the while his mental and physical health continued to fail, friends and acquaintances describing the “little Santos” as a “living skeleton.” In 1932, revolution broke out in Brazil, and military aircraft began attacking positions around São Paulo. This sight proved too much for the chronically depressed Santos-Dumont, and on July 23 he took his own life at the age of 59. The Government decreed a three-day period of national mourning, and on December 21 Santos-Dumont was buried at São João Batista Cemetery in Rio de Janeiro, under a statue of Icarus the aviator had designed himself.

Alberto Santos-Dumont is still considered a national hero in Brazil, with countless streets and other sites named in his honour. Though he may not have been first into the air, “little Santos” did more than most to cement the promise and romance of flight in the popular imagination, his dashing and eccentric escapades bringing an air of genteelness and wide-eyed optimism to the field of aviation the likes of which it would never see again.

Expand for References

Moolman, Valerie, The Road to Kitty Hawk, The Epic of Flight, Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia, 1980

Botting, Douglas, The Giant Airships, The Epic of Flight, Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia, 1981

Prendergast, Curtis, The First Aviators, The Epic of Flight, Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia, 1981

Marchand, Alain, Santos-Dumont: Pionnier de L’aviation, Dandy de la Belle Epoque, Aero Club de France, November 28, 2006, https://web.archive.org/web/20061128124844/http://www.aeroclub.com/santos_dumont_14bis_index.htm

The post Did Alberto Santos-Dumont Really Invent the Airplane? appeared first on Today I Found Out.

Read the whole story
JimB
40 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

EPA moves to stop considering economic benefits of cleaner air

1 Share

If you were to do a cost-benefit analysis of your lunch, it would be pretty difficult to do the calculation without the sandwich. But it appears that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is moving in this same direction—removing the benefit—when it comes to air pollution regulations.

According to a New York Times report based on internal emails and documents—and demonstrated by a recently produced analysis on the EPA website—the EPA is changing its cost-benefit analysis process for common air pollutants. Instead of comparing the economic cost of a certain pollution limit to an estimate of the economic value of the resulting improvements in human health, the EPA will just qualitatively describe health benefits while carefully quantifying economic costs.

Cost-benefit analysis has been a key component of EPA regulations. Any decision to raise or lower air quality standards or pollution limits includes evaluations of the cost that change, like the addition of new pollution control equipment at power plants, would incur, for example.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
JimB
43 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Trump launches $1m 'gold card' immigration visas

1 Comment
The special visas will be awarded to those who can show they can make a "substantial benefit" to the US.
Read the whole story
JimB
77 days ago
reply
Ass about face. If they can make a substantial benefit then surely they should be let in free?
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories