13950 stories
·
4 followers

Carbon Commentary newsletter 25th October 2026

1 Share

1, Rio Tinto begins plans the possible use of a large heat battery, one of the first to be used in an industrial process.

US-based Rondo will work on the design of a 360 MWh heat storage project for an alumina works owned by Rio Tinto in Queensland, Australia. If the plan goes ahead, it will be one of the first such ‘batteries’ in large scale heavy industry. Rondo’s technology is designed to take in electricity at times of day when power is very cheap - an increasing feature of the solar-dominated Australian grid - and convert it to very high temperature heat. The heat is released as steam over the rest of the 24 hours.

2, Electricity generation using cheap aluminium pellets.

The growth of data centres is being accompanied by an increase in behind the meter electricity production, often using highly polluting and noisy generators. This is contributing to the widespread resistance to the building of these large and highly energy intensive plants. Voya Energy uses scrap alumimium made into pellets and then combined with air, water and an electrolyte to produce electricity for buildings such as this. There is no combustion, no CO2 emission, no noise and no other source of pollution. The end product is an aluminium compound that can be used in a variety of other industries but eventually, Voya hopes, will be recycled back into pure aluminium for re-use in electricity generation. This isn’t a process that it is going to out-compete conventional sources of electricity such as solar power but may well be able to beat diesel, particularly in today’s conditions. Initial estimates are for a cost of around 30 cents per kilowatt hour. The company raised $35m in a venture capital fund raising backed by some of the best known US investors. (Thank you to Jesse Scharf).

3, Burgenland, Austria aims for net zero by 2030, largely by over-installing wind and solar.

Burgenland is a small Austrian province on the eastern edge of the country, running along the border with Hungary. Its population is only about 300,000 but it has aggressive ambitions for decarbonisation. It has raised more cash from the European investment bank to build more wind and solar farms. The intention is to use surplus energy to power heat networks and battery storage. This is accompanied by such policies as heavy investment in building insulation improvements and support for agrivoltaics in farming The detailed plan is to achieve full net zero by 2030, making it probably the first part of the EU to hit this target.

4, Should utilities be privately or publicly owned?

Bloomberg carried an article about the comparative electricity prices of two towns in Massachusetts, separated by a narrow lake. On one side, customers of a municipal utility pay 16 cents per kWh while on the other side, households pay 34 cents, a price that rivals the costliest countries in Europe. Their supplier is privately-owned National Grid, a subsidiary of the UK’s main transmission operator. Massachusetts prices are generally high by US standards and have increased above inflation in recent years. Moreover the gap between the two sides of the lake has increased in recent years. Can we generalise from this example to say that municipally owned utilities are more capable of delivering lower priced electricity? Not necessarily, but new work from an Oxford-based group has suggested that the large difference in the costs of capital between publicly owned electricity generators and private competitors may mean a real difference in prices charged. Their analysis suggests that the cost of capital of a fully public system in today’s financial condition may be 3 to 5 % percent less than a private owner. As a result, they conclude the state could buy out all UK generating assets at a fair market price of £72bn to generate an annual saving in electricity bills of almost £15bn.

5, Even as EU manufacturers ask for a relaxation of targets for the EV share of automotive sales, demand booms for electric cars.

Sales of EVs in Europe were up 60% in September 2026 compared to the same month last year. Tesla was up 71%. Chinese makers increased their market share as the EU debates rules that will slow the surge. So almost one third of car sales in Europe were fully electric in September.

6, Separating CO2 from other gases using specialised membranes.

Unisieve in Zurich raised $9m of capital to commercialise its technology for point source carbon capture using metal oxide frameworks (MOFs) to split different gases. The company writes ‘At the core of our technology is a membrane cartridge that continuously separates gas into two streams. Inside, crystal-tuned pores act as molecular sieve, allowing selected molecules through while retaining others’. If this approach works it will be particularly valuable for industries such as cement production. My guess is that MOFs are a plausible contender to be the lowest cost point source carbon capture route.

7, Large scale green hydrogen, ammonia and methanol production in China.

China Energy Engineering started construction of the second phase of a plant that will eventually produce 600,000 tonnes of green ammonia as well as hydrogen and e-methanol. This appears to be the first commercial scale green ammonia plant in China. (For reference, global production is about 200 million tonnes). Separately, ammonia from the existing much smaller factory on the site was used in the first refuelling at sea of a long distance vessel that uses it as a fuel. China’s low costs for producing hydrogen will give it a major advantage in producing internationally competitive ammonia, whether for powering ships or for fertiliser. In an additional boost for ammonia as a shipping fuel, Maersk obtained EU funding to convert four of its large carriers that transport ammonia to dual-fuel engines that can also run on ammonia.

8, Emissions from plug-in hybrid cars (PHEVs) far higher than officially estimated.

Two recent studies demonstrated again that PHEVs are used far less in electric mode than current EU estimates. As a result, their emissions are almost as great as ICE cars. A report from Transport and Environment using data from 2024 car registrations suggested an emissions level of 146 grams per kilometre, not the 24 grams officially estimated. For comparison, T&E wrote that non plug-in cars registered in 2024 had average emissions of 169 grams A study from the International Council on Clean Transportation offered a slightly lower figure for PHEV emissions but stlll far higher than expected. The main reason for the huge underestimate of CO2 emissions appears to be that PHEVs are only driven in electric mode from 21% of the time compared to the 80% assumed in official figures.

9, German battery storage companies go into insolvency even as the national energy storage market booms.

Sonnen, a well-established home battery brand with 150,000 installations, went underthis week. This follows several other failures of local energy storage companies in the German market. Nevertheless battery storage, both commercial and residential, continues to grow rapidly in the country. Over 500,000 new installations were made in the first nine months of this year, with residential customers alone - including those with small plug-in solar kits - buying just under 4 GWh of capacity. (For comparison, the UK probably has about 15 GWh of total battery storage). Perhaps surprisingly, Sonnen’s US subsidiary continues to prosper but in the German market lower priced Chinese competitors and aggressive larger competitors buying their hardware from Asia left Sonnen nursing huge losses.

10, The first Lego bricks made from plastic derived from e-methanol.

Lego said it would use e-methanol from European Energy’s pioneer plant at Kassø to make some of its components. The company suggests it will gradually increase the percentage of e-methanol used in the plastic production process for 90 of its bricks. The European Energy factory makes the e-methanol from green hydrogen and CO2 collected from a biomass electricity plant. Lego’s move into using e-methanol as a raw material follows the increasing use of recycled plastics in its products. Its goal is that the bricks will be 100% low carbon by 2032 as part of the company’s path to net zero by 2050. But this week’s announcement about e-methanol didn’t hide from saying that progress is difficult. The move ‘follows more than five years of partnership, testing, learning and scaling to use e-methanol for the production of plastic. It’s been a complex journey.’

As always, I’m very grateful to those readers who sent in suggestions for news items to cover. Thank you.

Read the whole story
JimB
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Updated Google privacy policy says your Gmail might be used for advertising

1 Comment

Using Google's products and services has always been fundamentally precarious—doing so gives the world's largest advertising company a lot of juicy personal data. Google has long said it won't use the sensitive data from products like Gmail, Drive, and Photos for ad personalization, but a change to the company's privacy policy appears to dismantle that firewall.

On October 16, Google issued an update to its privacy policy, spotted by Android Authority. The ad personalization section used to include a clear limit on data from certain apps. "We don’t show you personalized ads based on your content from Drive, Gmail, or Photos," the document said. Now, Google has updated it with the following language.

Updated language on when your sensitive data might inform ads. Credit: Google

This equivocation opens the door to using data from apps like Gmail and Photos in ads when it's shared with other Google services, and it just so happens Google has a mechanism for doing that, with Personal Intelligence. The company released Personal Intelligence in early 2026, allowing users to hand data from multiple apps to Google AI products. The idea is that the added context from your existing data will lead to better AI answers, but it's also proving to be a privacy minefield.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
JimB
3 days ago
reply
Don't be evil. They once said.
Share this story
Delete

One million UK adults who have never smoked are now vaping

1 Comment
Latest statistics also show, for the second year in a row, more over-16s vape than smoke.
Read the whole story
JimB
21 days ago
reply
Horrifying
Share this story
Delete

Fraud, lies, perjury ... inside the disturbing new allegations against Tommy Robinson

1 Share

If you think you know what there is to know about far-right campaigner Tommy Robinson, think again. Born Stephen Yaxley, Robinson is known as the white nationalist agitator who co-founded the English Defence League and whose extremist anti-immigration views have attracted the praise of the likes of Elon Musk. But a Channel 4 documentary released this week by freelance documentary film-maker Matt Shea shows just how much deeper the Robinson rot goes. 

Shea’s film, which aimed to follow Robinson’s money trail – given that he has raised potentially millions of pounds from supporters and there has been, until now, little evidence of where that money ended up – revealed shocking details not only about Robinson’s potentially fraudulent financial dealings but also disturbing new information about his treatment of survivors of grooming gangs, his questionable claims about being “debanked” and even evidence that he may have committed perjury by lying under oath.

The Nerve sat down with Matt to discuss some of the most important revelations that his year-long investigation uncovered.

What did you find out in your new film, Tommy Robinson: Where’s The Money Gone? about Robinson’s donations and fundraising efforts, and where the money was coming from and ending up?

So one of the main things I sensed about Tommy Robinson is that behind him is this mass of people who are constantly donating to him. He has raised hundreds of thousands of pounds, if not millions, from his supporters, but it's very unclear what that money is spent on because most of the companies that have handled the donations that he's called for have never filed accounts. 

I went to his Unite the Kingdom rallies, and most of the people I spoke to had donated money to him. He's constantly appealing for money. And I think the most shocking revelation regarding fundraising that I think we found was about a grooming gang survivor who goes by the pseudonym “Kate” in the film.

Can you tell us more about Kate?

Kate is a survivor of one of the most notorious grooming gangs, known as the Telford grooming gang. What happened to her is so traumatic I couldn't even bear to repeat it. Robinson included her in his so-called documentary series The Rape of Britain. He initially approached her and said that he kind of tracked her down using the police database and using someone – his associate – who used to work for MI5. She was quite traumatised by him approaching her, because she had tried to hide her address after what had happened to her due to fear of reprisals from the grooming gang. 

When he tracked her down, she was suffering from PTSD and was just in a really terrible state, and he persuaded her to be in his film. Shortly after that, she was actually about to attempt suicide outside the home of one of her attackers when Tommy Robinson called her.  And he told her: don't do it... But unbeknown to her, he was recording this phone call at the time. At first she had agreed to be in the film, and he had paid her £500, but at a certain point she said she didn’t want to be in this film any more. She said: “I don't want you to identify me. I don't want you to use the phone call that you recorded without my consent.”

But then he used all of those things in this documentary, which he screened in Telford, her hometown, where these attacks happened. He screened it publicly. And that's when she first found out from the screening that the phone call was in the film, that her real name had been used. And she was furious.

On top of that, she said that she never received the funds that Tommy Robinson raised in her name. And you know, grooming gang survivors are such a central part of his message, a major reason that he often cites for people to donate to him. And to think that this grooming gang survivor who he mentions specifically during his fundraiser doesn't receive any of the money was shocking. 

And Robinson’s “fundraising” for grooming gang survivors is also part of how he connected with Elon Musk – can you tell us about that?

Yes, so for Elon Musk, the idea that Britain is this “fallen nation”, overrun by grooming gangs, and that the government's doing nothing about it, was a real draw to Tommy Robinson for him. So Robinson has clearly attracted a lot of support and wealth from these women's stories, including from Musk.

What else can you tell us about the connection between Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk?

I was shocked to see that Robinson had taken a trip to Russia, which was billed as a trip with Elon Musk’s father. But in fact it was the Musk Family Foundation that funded that trip – so there's a big question there. Why is Musk's family foundation sending a far-right British activist to get exposure to members of the Kremlin – and, while he is there, promoting content of some quite extremist neo-nazi Russian ultranationalist groups?

The other interesting thing is that when Tommy Robinson was in Russia was around the time that the [Henry Nowak trial] became a cause célèbre of the right. And Robinson filmed or shared footage of these ultra-nationalists in Russia holding a rally in memorial of this British teenager that had died. So that is bizarre, right? The idea that an ultra-nationalist Russian group is holding a rally memorial of a British teenager who was murdered is very strange.

Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, at a demonstration in Southampton about the police's involvement in Henry Nowak death, 2 June, 2026

And the Musk relationship is also crucial for Robinson’s platform because Musk restored his X account after he was suspended, right?

Yes. The thing about Musk and Robinson on X is that Musk frequently boosts Robinson's tweets by reposting them or commenting on them. And Musk generates a huge amount of traffic for Robinson on X. The things he says are carefully worded. They very carefully toe the line so that they never call for outright violence to a group of people or a person. But the comments underneath are some of the most shocking things I’ve seen. People call for a genocide of Muslims, people call for hate crimes, for the worst things you can imagine, frequently, very frequently, underneath those comments.

And for your film you also managed to speak to some really important sources who used to support Robinson but had become concerned. Can you tell us about them?

One really important source is Paul Bates. He used to work in the heart of Tommy Robinson's crowd security team in 2024 and 2025. And he became concerned that Robinson was essentially milking poor working-class people for their money and then spending it all on his family and his lifestyle.

There’s a particular case in which a man called Peter Lynch, who was a 61-year-old grandfather who who was convicted of violent disorder during the 2024 riots. And he sadly took his own life in jail.

And Robinson took up the cause and he kind of called Lynch a martyr. And while Robinson was in prison for something else, one of his key organisers at a rally appealed for donations for Lynch's family. But it was later revealed that no money appeared to have gone to Peter Lynch's family. Now, Robinson's explanation for that was that they didn't want the money for whatever reason. But ultimately Robinson’s family is the only family that benefited from this appeal, which was meant to in part go to the family of this man who died. 

In the film there’s also a brilliant interview in the film with a former director of public prosecutions, who had some very interesting things to say about the evidence that you uncovered. Can you tell us a bit about that?

So we spoke to Sir Max Hill, the former director of public prosecutions. We presented him with the evidence we had found and he said that Robinson’s failure to pass on the funds to the grooming gang survivor in our film is likely to be considered fraud, so that could lead to a criminal investigation. But not only that, there's this kind of complicated issue around when Robinson was found guilty of libelling Syrian teenager Jamal Hijazi [who lives in Huddersfield], who Robinson said had attacked English girls. He was found to have libelled him and had to pay £100,000 in damages to Hijazi. 

But Robinson claimed at the time that he couldn't pay because he didn't have enough money and he didn't have any assets. 

Robinson was asked by the high court about Lennon Consultancy Ltd, which handled donations from his supporters and was run by his ex-wife, Jenna Lennon. He was asked: what did this company do? And, under oath, he replied: “It was a company owned by my ex-wife. It's not my company, and I don't know”. 

But I was able to obtain a document that shows he was actively involved in running this company: I obtained a legal agreement signed by him on behalf of this company. We also found emails that show him kind of handling company business. And when I spoke about that to Sir Max Hill, he said this could constitute perjury and that that could be a matter for the police to investigate.

Can you tell us about Robinson’s use of the idea of him being “debanked” in his fundraising campaigns, and about how you personally tested that theory?

Absolutely. Tommy Robinson has gotten a lot of mileage out of it, because a lot of the people who I spoke to who've donated to Tommy Robinson donated to him specifically because of this notion that he is “debanked”. He claims he can’t get a bank in the UK so people donate to him in cash or in crypto. 

But I found a bank account in his name. And to prove that it was real, I sent him £1 with the reference “just checking”, and it went through successfully. So, if I can send money to a UK bank account in his name, why is he telling his supporters that no UK bank account will process payments for him? In response to that, he said the account I found is a “personal basic account” and he says “I do not have a normal current account”. I'm not quite sure what that means…

You spoke to another very powerful source who was an ex-associate of Robinson’s. Can you tell us about Lauren?

I genuinely think that Lauren Southern is one of the most inspirational people I've met because she is someone who made her entire career and her entire personality about being rightwing, criticising feminism, but then she was taken by Tommy Robinson to meet Andrew Tate in Romania. She says that she was raped by Andrew Tate [which Andrew Tate denies]. 

She’s got contemporary evidence of what she alleges, including medical evidence. And it made her completely reconsider a lot of her views about the right. She decided to go public with those allegations, knowing that it would lose her bunch of followers, knowing that it would lead to a horrific campaign of abuse, and attempts to discredit her, which goes on to this day. I mean, the abuse I get for doing this journalism is bad, but it is nothing compared to the abuse that someone like Lauren gets. And she knew that would happen, but she did it anyway. She also had the courage to kind of disavow her views that she had been espousing on social media for so long.

And she helped put a crucial piece of the puzzle into place by telling you that, in her view, he was definitely motivated by financial gain?

Yes. So she used to work with Tommy Robinson. She was young at the time, and she remembers that, you know, he spent a lot of money on partying, on drugs. She talks about how he loves Gucci and expensive cars. Ultimately, she believes from her experience with him that he's motivated hugely by money.

Tommy Robinson: Where’s The Money Gone? is available to stream on channel4.com 

The Nerve is a fearless, independent media title launched by five former Guardian / Observer journalists: investigative journalist Carole Cadwalladr, editors Sarah Donaldson, Jane Ferguson and Imogen Carter and creative director Lynsey Irvine. We cover culture, politics and tech, brought to you in twice weekly newsletters on Tuesdays and Fridays (sign up here). We rely on funding from our community, so please also consider joining us as a paying member. You can read more about our mission here.
Read the whole story
JimB
45 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

How cleaning up the air is speeding up global warming - and revealing a bigger problem

1 Share
A curious online row over this summer's heatwaves points to a wider - and worrying - shift in climate science.
Read the whole story
JimB
46 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

"Sabotage": Experts, lawmakers blast RFK Jr. for destroying healthcare research

1 Share

The federal agency tasked with studying ways to improve America's outstandingly poor healthcare system is "on the brink," experts warn. The Trump administration has cut its staff by 75 percent, canceled its grants en masse, and is refusing to spend tens of millions of dollars appropriated by Congress.

Whether the agency "will survive the second Trump administration is an open question," health policy experts Aaron Carroll and David Atkins wrote in an opinion piece published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The agency in question is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which has focused on ways to improve patient safety, healthcare quality, care delivery, and new technologies and practices since the 1990s. In the past, "Republican leaders recognized that health care disparities were fundamental quality problems," Carroll and Atkins wrote. But recently, disparities in care have become partisan issues.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
JimB
69 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories