
If you think you know what there is to know about far-right campaigner Tommy Robinson, think again. Born Stephen Yaxley, Robinson is known as the white nationalist agitator who co-founded the English Defence League and whose extremist anti-immigration views have attracted the praise of the likes of Elon Musk. But a Channel 4 documentary released this week by freelance documentary film-maker Matt Shea shows just how much deeper the Robinson rot goes.
Shea’s film, which aimed to follow Robinson’s money trail – given that he has raised potentially millions of pounds from supporters and there has been, until now, little evidence of where that money ended up – revealed shocking details not only about Robinson’s potentially fraudulent financial dealings but also disturbing new information about his treatment of survivors of grooming gangs, his questionable claims about being “debanked” and even evidence that he may have committed perjury by lying under oath.
The Nerve sat down with Matt to discuss some of the most important revelations that his year-long investigation uncovered.
What did you find out in your new film, Tommy Robinson: Where’s The Money Gone? about Robinson’s donations and fundraising efforts, and where the money was coming from and ending up?
So one of the main things I sensed about Tommy Robinson is that behind him is this mass of people who are constantly donating to him. He has raised hundreds of thousands of pounds, if not millions, from his supporters, but it's very unclear what that money is spent on because most of the companies that have handled the donations that he's called for have never filed accounts.
I went to his Unite the Kingdom rallies, and most of the people I spoke to had donated money to him. He's constantly appealing for money. And I think the most shocking revelation regarding fundraising that I think we found was about a grooming gang survivor who goes by the pseudonym “Kate” in the film.
Can you tell us more about Kate?
Kate is a survivor of one of the most notorious grooming gangs, known as the Telford grooming gang. What happened to her is so traumatic I couldn't even bear to repeat it. Robinson included her in his so-called documentary series The Rape of Britain. He initially approached her and said that he kind of tracked her down using the police database and using someone – his associate – who used to work for MI5. She was quite traumatised by him approaching her, because she had tried to hide her address after what had happened to her due to fear of reprisals from the grooming gang.
When he tracked her down, she was suffering from PTSD and was just in a really terrible state, and he persuaded her to be in his film. Shortly after that, she was actually about to attempt suicide outside the home of one of her attackers when Tommy Robinson called her. And he told her: don't do it... But unbeknown to her, he was recording this phone call at the time. At first she had agreed to be in the film, and he had paid her £500, but at a certain point she said she didn’t want to be in this film any more. She said: “I don't want you to identify me. I don't want you to use the phone call that you recorded without my consent.”
But then he used all of those things in this documentary, which he screened in Telford, her hometown, where these attacks happened. He screened it publicly. And that's when she first found out from the screening that the phone call was in the film, that her real name had been used. And she was furious.
On top of that, she said that she never received the funds that Tommy Robinson raised in her name. And you know, grooming gang survivors are such a central part of his message, a major reason that he often cites for people to donate to him. And to think that this grooming gang survivor who he mentions specifically during his fundraiser doesn't receive any of the money was shocking.
And Robinson’s “fundraising” for grooming gang survivors is also part of how he connected with Elon Musk – can you tell us about that?
Yes, so for Elon Musk, the idea that Britain is this “fallen nation”, overrun by grooming gangs, and that the government's doing nothing about it, was a real draw to Tommy Robinson for him. So Robinson has clearly attracted a lot of support and wealth from these women's stories, including from Musk.
What else can you tell us about the connection between Tommy Robinson and Elon Musk?
I was shocked to see that Robinson had taken a trip to Russia, which was billed as a trip with Elon Musk’s father. But in fact it was the Musk Family Foundation that funded that trip – so there's a big question there. Why is Musk's family foundation sending a far-right British activist to get exposure to members of the Kremlin – and, while he is there, promoting content of some quite extremist neo-nazi Russian ultranationalist groups?
The other interesting thing is that when Tommy Robinson was in Russia was around the time that the [Henry Nowak trial] became a cause célèbre of the right. And Robinson filmed or shared footage of these ultra-nationalists in Russia holding a rally in memorial of this British teenager that had died. So that is bizarre, right? The idea that an ultra-nationalist Russian group is holding a rally memorial of a British teenager who was murdered is very strange.

Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, at a demonstration in Southampton about the police's involvement in Henry Nowak death, 2 June, 2026
And the Musk relationship is also crucial for Robinson’s platform because Musk restored his X account after he was suspended, right?
Yes. The thing about Musk and Robinson on X is that Musk frequently boosts Robinson's tweets by reposting them or commenting on them. And Musk generates a huge amount of traffic for Robinson on X. The things he says are carefully worded. They very carefully toe the line so that they never call for outright violence to a group of people or a person. But the comments underneath are some of the most shocking things I’ve seen. People call for a genocide of Muslims, people call for hate crimes, for the worst things you can imagine, frequently, very frequently, underneath those comments.
And for your film you also managed to speak to some really important sources who used to support Robinson but had become concerned. Can you tell us about them?
One really important source is Paul Bates. He used to work in the heart of Tommy Robinson's crowd security team in 2024 and 2025. And he became concerned that Robinson was essentially milking poor working-class people for their money and then spending it all on his family and his lifestyle.
There’s a particular case in which a man called Peter Lynch, who was a 61-year-old grandfather who who was convicted of violent disorder during the 2024 riots. And he sadly took his own life in jail.
And Robinson took up the cause and he kind of called Lynch a martyr. And while Robinson was in prison for something else, one of his key organisers at a rally appealed for donations for Lynch's family. But it was later revealed that no money appeared to have gone to Peter Lynch's family. Now, Robinson's explanation for that was that they didn't want the money for whatever reason. But ultimately Robinson’s family is the only family that benefited from this appeal, which was meant to in part go to the family of this man who died.
In the film there’s also a brilliant interview in the film with a former director of public prosecutions, who had some very interesting things to say about the evidence that you uncovered. Can you tell us a bit about that?
So we spoke to Sir Max Hill, the former director of public prosecutions. We presented him with the evidence we had found and he said that Robinson’s failure to pass on the funds to the grooming gang survivor in our film is likely to be considered fraud, so that could lead to a criminal investigation. But not only that, there's this kind of complicated issue around when Robinson was found guilty of libelling Syrian teenager Jamal Hijazi [who lives in Huddersfield], who Robinson said had attacked English girls. He was found to have libelled him and had to pay £100,000 in damages to Hijazi.
But Robinson claimed at the time that he couldn't pay because he didn't have enough money and he didn't have any assets.
Robinson was asked by the high court about Lennon Consultancy Ltd, which handled donations from his supporters and was run by his ex-wife, Jenna Lennon. He was asked: what did this company do? And, under oath, he replied: “It was a company owned by my ex-wife. It's not my company, and I don't know”.
But I was able to obtain a document that shows he was actively involved in running this company: I obtained a legal agreement signed by him on behalf of this company. We also found emails that show him kind of handling company business. And when I spoke about that to Sir Max Hill, he said this could constitute perjury and that that could be a matter for the police to investigate.
Can you tell us about Robinson’s use of the idea of him being “debanked” in his fundraising campaigns, and about how you personally tested that theory?
Absolutely. Tommy Robinson has gotten a lot of mileage out of it, because a lot of the people who I spoke to who've donated to Tommy Robinson donated to him specifically because of this notion that he is “debanked”. He claims he can’t get a bank in the UK so people donate to him in cash or in crypto.
But I found a bank account in his name. And to prove that it was real, I sent him £1 with the reference “just checking”, and it went through successfully. So, if I can send money to a UK bank account in his name, why is he telling his supporters that no UK bank account will process payments for him? In response to that, he said the account I found is a “personal basic account” and he says “I do not have a normal current account”. I'm not quite sure what that means…
You spoke to another very powerful source who was an ex-associate of Robinson’s. Can you tell us about Lauren?
I genuinely think that Lauren Southern is one of the most inspirational people I've met because she is someone who made her entire career and her entire personality about being rightwing, criticising feminism, but then she was taken by Tommy Robinson to meet Andrew Tate in Romania. She says that she was raped by Andrew Tate [which Andrew Tate denies].
She’s got contemporary evidence of what she alleges, including medical evidence. And it made her completely reconsider a lot of her views about the right. She decided to go public with those allegations, knowing that it would lose her bunch of followers, knowing that it would lead to a horrific campaign of abuse, and attempts to discredit her, which goes on to this day. I mean, the abuse I get for doing this journalism is bad, but it is nothing compared to the abuse that someone like Lauren gets. And she knew that would happen, but she did it anyway. She also had the courage to kind of disavow her views that she had been espousing on social media for so long.
And she helped put a crucial piece of the puzzle into place by telling you that, in her view, he was definitely motivated by financial gain?
Yes. So she used to work with Tommy Robinson. She was young at the time, and she remembers that, you know, he spent a lot of money on partying, on drugs. She talks about how he loves Gucci and expensive cars. Ultimately, she believes from her experience with him that he's motivated hugely by money.
Tommy Robinson: Where’s The Money Gone? is available to stream on channel4.com
The federal agency tasked with studying ways to improve America's outstandingly poor healthcare system is "on the brink," experts warn. The Trump administration has cut its staff by 75 percent, canceled its grants en masse, and is refusing to spend tens of millions of dollars appropriated by Congress.
Whether the agency "will survive the second Trump administration is an open question," health policy experts Aaron Carroll and David Atkins wrote in an opinion piece published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
The agency in question is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), which has focused on ways to improve patient safety, healthcare quality, care delivery, and new technologies and practices since the 1990s. In the past, "Republican leaders recognized that health care disparities were fundamental quality problems," Carroll and Atkins wrote. But recently, disparities in care have become partisan issues.
Who funds Nigel Farage? The year is 2026. It’s 10 years since Farage played a pivotal role in changing Britain’s constitution and its place in the world. And the UK press has finally woken from its decade-long stupor.
It’s the most basic of all questions: who is funding the man whose party was, until very recently, ascendant in the polls and looking like the possible next prime minister?
Last month, I wrote about my own decade of frustration and fear, the years I spent trying to draw back the curtain on the money men behind him. That included George Cottrell, the convicted fraudster and money laundering expert who’s recently been thrust on to the national stage, even as those questions were ignored by Britain’s overwhelmingly rightwing media and I was pilloried.
I always wondered if that would ever change. And now it has. The highly influential Murdoch press, led by the Sunday Times reporting team, is now finally on Farage’s case and it’s a game-changer.
Farage has never known anything like it. There are now questions which even he can’t dodge. Questions even the BBC is finally asking. And his luck seems to be running out. A hasty plan to throw off a parliamentary investigation by quitting parliament before he could be sanctioned has spectacularly backfired in the biggest own goal of his career.
It’s high summer, Farage is fighting a pointless byelection against a bin, and, still, the questions keep coming. Central to our mission at the Nerve is public interest accountability journalism, and that’s why, back in May, we threw ourselves into a new investigation, the Harborne Receipts. Today, we set out everything we’ve learned so far.
When the name of Christopher Harborne first surfaced in April, in Anna Isaac’s brilliant Guardian scoop about his five-million-quid donation to Farage, the questions came thick and fast. Who is Christopher Harborne? Why had he given Farage £5m? And what does he want?
This is what we’ve been trying to answer over the last three months, in a series of stories that have tried to pick apart Harborne’s complex web of interests and interactions with UK politics.
We began with a timeline: every donation Harborne has ever made to the Conservatives, the Brexit party, Farage, Boris Johnson, the Conservatives and now Reform UK. And from that we began to pattern-match, to understand the flow of money in relation to the interests of a cryptobillionaire with significant investments in defence technology.
So far, we’ve revealed:
Part 2: Allegations of a “deal” between Farage, Johnson and Harborne to “fix” the 2019 general election.
Today, we’re publishing a new master version of our investigation timeline (below). Because the devil is in the detail and the 1,000-foot view. And because, taking our cue from OSINT – open source intelligence – we’re sharing our research.
There is much more to be done. But we wanted to take a moment to reflect on what we’ve learned so far. Because Harborne is still a ghost. There are few photos of him (in fact, we identified in June that Harborne was present, unsuspected, in the background of a photo widely published when Farage stood down Brexit party candidates in the 2019 election). He’s a man who has deliberately kept under the radar. But we do now know much more than we did. And if you read some of these stories, you do too.

Brexit party leader Nigel Farage on the campaign trail in Hartlepool on the day (11 November 2019) that he announced he was standing down 317 Brexit candidates in Tory-held seats. Christopher Harborne (pink trousers) is in the background. Photograph: Ian Forsyth/Getty
My reflection from writing and co-authoring a significant chunk of these articles alongside our terrific Nerve team – Charlie Young, Lucia Osborne-Crowley and Ian Tucker – is that the UK body politic is still struggling to metabolise the extent and complexity of Farage’s financial affairs. The Sunday Times is running full pelt at the Cottrell story but it hasn’t covered his Russian connections – as we did last week – or his involvement in Brexit. And Harborne’s long involvement with Johnson and the Conservatives is an essential piece of this tale. It’s an important piece of pattern-matching but almost none of it has been reported elsewhere.
And even where some other outlets have covered the crypto connection, it’s not in the forensic detail we’ve been able to go into here.
Nigel Farage – rightly – is the central figure in all this. But what our reporting reveals is that it’s not just Farage. The new political money behind him is not dependent on him; it’s the other way around. If Farage vanished in a puff of intergalactic smoke, it wouldn’t matter. Harborne has repeatedly switched parties and politicians before. He could easily do so again.
And that’s why it’s critical to know who these funders are and what they want. That includes Cottrell and others, but Harborne is the biggest whale of them all.
UK politics has changed. The amount of new money coming in is still tiny compared with US politics, but it’s not only growing fast, it’s also following the exact same playbook that saw Donald Trump, against the odds, return to power. The crypto industry donated more than $238m to pro-Trump Super PACs: more than any other individual or sector. And Harborne has donated more than £20m to Farage and his parties.
We’re keeping the receipts because Farage vs a bin isn’t a pantomime. It’s what casino capitalism enabled by new crypto tools looks like when played out against the lives of real people.
This timeline will be updated to reflect developments in the story as they happen


Screenshot of a Guardian article from 11 November 2019, featuring a picture of Nigel Farage in Hartlepool. Christopher Harborne, fourth from left in the pink trousers, was not identified at the time – or, indeed, even known to be a Brexit party donor. (Photograph: Ian Forsyth/Getty)


George Cottrell, Christopher Harborne and Nigel Farage at Scott's restaurant in Mayfair, London, 6th July 2020. Photo: MJ Pictures

Screengrab from a Facebook video of Farage promoting his new-found enthusiasm for crypto, December 2020. The video was an ad for Farage’s subscribers’ newsletter Fortune and Freedom.




Nigel Farage holds up a copy of his proposed crypto assets and digital finance bill at The Bitcoin Conference, Las Vegas, 29 May 2025. Photo: Ian Maule/Getty



